Correcting Erroneous Information Returns, Form #04.001, Section 3
(OFFSITE LINK)-SEDM Forms
"The taxpayer-- that's someone who works for the federal government
but doesn't have to take the civil service examination."
[President Ronald W. Reagan]
As we said in the preceding section, the income
tax described by Internal Revenue Code, Subtitle A is a franchise
and excise tax upon “public offices” within the U.S. government, which
the code defines as a “trade or business”. Before an income tax
can lawfully be enforced or collected, the subject of the tax must be
connected to the activity with court-admissible evidence. Information
returns are the method by which the activity is
connected to the
subject of the tax under the authority of
26 U.S.C. §6041(a). When this connection is made, the person
engaging in the excise taxable activity is called “effectively connected
with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States”.
TITLE 26 >
Subtitle F >
CHAPTER 61 >
Subchapter A >
PART III >
Subpart B > § 6041
§ 6041. Information at source
(a) Payments of $600 or more
All persons engaged
in a trade or business and making payment in the course of such
trade or business to another person, of rent, salaries,
wages, premiums, annuities, compensations, remunerations, emoluments,
or other fixed or determinable gains, profits, and income (other
than payments to which section 6042 (a)(1), 6044 (a)(1), 6047 (e),
6049 (a), or 6050N (a) applies, and other than payments with respect
to which a statement is required under the authority of section
6042 (a)(2), 6044 (a)(2), or 6045), of $600 or more in any taxable
year, or, in the case of such payments made by the United States,
the officers or employees of the United States having information
as to such payments and required to make returns in regard thereto
by the regulations hereinafter provided for,
shall render a true and
accurate return to the Secretary, under such regulations and in
such form and manner and to such extent as may be prescribed by
the Secretary, setting forth the amount of such gains, profits,
and income, and the name and address of the recipient of such payment.
The government cannot lawfully regulate private
conduct. The ability to regulate private conduct is, in fact,
“repugnant to the constitution” as held by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The only thing the government can regulate is “public conduct” and the
“public rights” and franchises that enforce or implement it. Consequently,
the government must deceive private parties into submitting false reports
connecting their private labor and private property to such a public
use, public purpose, and public office in order that they can usurp
jurisdiction over it and thereby tax and plunder it.
“The power to "legislate generally
upon" life, liberty, and property, as opposed to the "power to provide
modes of redress" against offensive state action, was "repugnant"
to the Constitution. Id., at 15. See also United States v. Reese,
92 U.S. 214, 218
(1876); United States v. Harris,
106 U.S. 629, 639
(1883) ; James v. Bowman,
190 U.S. 127, 139
(1903) . Although the specific holdings of these early cases
might have been superseded or modified, see, e.g., Heart of Atlanta
Motel, Inc. v. United States,
379 U.S. 241 (1964);
United States v. Guest,
383 U.S. 745 (1966),
their treatment of Congress' §5 power as corrective or preventive,
not definitional, has not been questioned.”
of Boerne v. Florez, Archbishop of San Antonio, 521 U.S. 507 (1997)
In a sense, the function of an information return therefore is to:
- Provide evidence that the owner is consensually and lawfully
engaged in the “trade or business” and public office franchise.
These reports cannot lawfully be filed if this is not the case.
26 U.S.C. §7206 and
7207 make it a crime to file a false report.
- Donate formerly
private property described on the report to a
purpose, and a public
office with the consent of the owner without any immediate or monetary
compensation in order to procure the “benefits” incident to participation
in the franchise.
- Subject the property to excise taxation upon the “trade or business”
- Subject the property to use and control by the government:
“Men are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable rights,-'life, liberty, and the pursuit
of happiness;' and to 'secure,' not grant or create, these rights,
governments are instituted.
That property [or income]
which a man has honestly acquired he retains full control of, subject
to these limitations: First, that he shall not use it
to his neighbor's injury, and that does not mean that he must use
it for his neighbor's benefit [e.g. SOCIAL SECURITY, Medicare, and
every other public “benefit”];
that if he devotes it to a public use, he gives to the public
a right to control that use; and third, that whenever
the public needs require, the public may take it upon payment of
[Budd v. People of State of New York,
143 U.S. 517 (1892)]
On the other hand,
if the information return:
- Was filed against an owner of the property described who
is not lawfully engaged in a public office or a “trade or business”
in the U.S. government. . .OR
- Was filed in a case where the owner of the
did not consent to donate the property described to a public use
and a public office by signing a contract or agreement authorizing
such as an IRS Form W-4. . .OR
- Was filed mistakenly or fraudulently.
. . .then the following
crimes have occurred:
violation of the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause has occurred:
U.S. Constitution, Fifth Amendment
No person shall
be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless
on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases
arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in
actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person
be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life
or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness
against himself, nor
be deprived of life, liberty,
or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property
be taken for public use, without just compensation.
2. A violation of due process has occurred. Any taking of
property without the consent of the owner is a violation of due process
3. The subject of the information return is being compelled to
impersonate a public officer in criminal violation of
18 U.S.C. §912.
TITLE 18 >
PART I >
CHAPTER 43 > § 912
§ 912. Officer or employee of the United States
Whoever falsely assumes or pretends
to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United
States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as
such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money,
paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
4. An unlawful
conversion of private
property to public
property has occurred in criminal violation of
18 U.S.C. §654. Only officers of the government called “withholding
agents” appointed under the authority of
26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(16) and the I.R.C. can lawfully file these information
returns or withhold upon the proceeds of the transaction. All
withholding and reporting agents are public officers, not private parties,
whether they receive direct compensation for acting in that capacity
TITLE 18 >
PART I >
CHAPTER 31 > § 654
§ 654. Officer or employee of United States converting property
Whoever, being an officer
or employee of the United States or of any department or agency
thereof, embezzles or wrongfully converts to his own use the money
or property of another which comes into his possession or under
his control in the execution of such office or employment, or under
color or claim of authority as such officer or employee, shall be
fined under this title or not more than the value of the money and
property thus embezzled or converted, whichever is greater, or imprisoned
not more than ten years, or both; but if the sum embezzled is $1,000
or less, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than one year, or both.
If you would like
to learn more about how the above mechanisms work, see:
Nearly all private
Americans are not in fact and in deed lawfully engaged in a “public
office” and cannot therefore serve within such an office without committing
the crime of impersonating a public officer. This is exhaustively
proven in the following:
What makes someone
a “private American” is, in fact, that they are not lawfully engaged
in a public office or any other government franchise. All franchises,
in fact, make those engaged into public officers of one kind or another
and cause them to forfeit their status as a private person and give
up all their constitutional rights in the process. See:
IRS therefore mis-represents
and mis-enforces the Internal Revenue Code by abusing their tax
forms and their untrustworthy printed propaganda as a method:
- To unlawfully create public offices in the government in places
they are forbidden to even exist pursuant to
4 U.S.C. §72.
- To “elect” the average American unlawfully into such an
- To cause those involuntarily serving in the office to unlawfully
impersonate a public officer in criminal violation of
18 U.S.C. §912.
- To enforce the obligations of the office upon those who are
not lawfully occupying said office.
- Of election fraud, whereby the contributions collected cause
those who contribute them to bribe a public official to procure
the office that they occupy with unlawfully collected monies, in
criminal violation of
18 U.S.C. §210. IRS Document 6209 identifies all
IRS Form W-2 contributions as “gifts” to the U.S. government, which
is a polite way of describing what actually amounts to a bribe.
TITLE 18 >
PART I >
CHAPTER 11 > § 210
§ 210. Offer to procure appointive public office
Whoever pays or offers
or promises any money [withheld unlawfully] or thing
of value, to any person, firm, or corporation
in consideration of the
use or promise to use any influence to procure any appointive [public]
office or place under the United States for any person,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one
year, or both.
For instance, innocent Americans ignorant of the
law are deceived into volunteering to unlawfully accept the obligations
of a public office by filing an IRS Form W-4 “agreement” to withhold
26 U.S.C. §3402(p), 26 C.F.R. §31.3401(a)-3(a), and 26 C.F.R. §31.3402(p)-1.
26 C.F.R. §31.3401(a)-3 Amounts deemed wages under voluntary withholding
(a) In general.
Notwithstanding the exceptions
to the definition of wages specified in section 3401(a) and the
regulations thereunder, the term “wages” includes the amounts described
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section with respect to which there
is a voluntary withholding agreement in effect under section 3402(p).
References in this chapter to the definition of wages contained
in section 3401(a) shall be deemed to refer also to this section
26 C.F.R. § 31.3402(p)-1 Voluntary withholding agreements.
(a) In general.
An employee and his employer may
enter into an agreement under section 3402(b) to provide for the
withholding of income tax upon payments of amounts described in
paragraph (b)(1) of §31.3401(a)–3, made after December 31, 1970.
An agreement may be
entered into under this section only with respect to amounts which
are includible in the gross income of the employee under section
61, and must be applicable to all such amounts paid by the employer
to the employee. The amount to be withheld pursuant to
an agreement under section 3402(p) shall be determined under the
rules contained in section 3402 and the regulations thereunder.
See §31.3405(c)–1, Q&A–3 concerning agreements to have more than
20-percent Federal income tax withheld from eligible rollover distributions
within the meaning of section 402.
Those who have not
voluntarily signed and submitted the IRS Form W-4 contract/agreement
and who are were
engaged in a “public office” within the U.S. government
signed any tax form cannot truthfully or lawfully earn reportable “wages”
as legally defined in
26 U.S.C. §3402. Therefore, even if the IRS sends a “lock-down”
letter telling the private employer to withhold at a rate of “single
with no exemptions”, he must withhold ONLY on the amount of “wages”
earned, which is still zero. If a W-2 is filed against a person
who does not voluntarily sign and submit the W-4 or who is not lawfully
engaged in a public office:
- 1. The amount reported must be ZERO for everything on
the form, and especially for “wages”.
- 2. If any amount reported is other than zero, then the
payroll clerk submitting the W-2 is criminally liable for filing
a false return under
26 U.S.C. §7206 , punishable as a felony for up to a $100,000
fine and three years in jail.
- 3. If you also warned the payroll clerk that they were
doing it improperly in writing and have a proof you served them
with it, their actions also become fraudulent and they are additionally
26 U.S.C. §7207 , punishable as a felony for up to $10,000 and
up to one year in jail.
The heart of the
tax fraud and SCAM perpetrated on a massive scale by our government
publish IRS forms and publications which contain untrustworthy information
that deceives the public into believing that they have a legal obligation
to file false information returns against their neighbor.
"IRS Publications, issued by the National Office, explain
the law in plain language for taxpayers and their advisors... While
a good source of general information, publications
should not be cited to
sustain a position."
Revenue Manual, Section 220.127.116.11.8
reinforce the deliberate deception and omissions in their publications
with verbal advice that is equally damaging and untrustworthy:
p. 21: "As discussed in §2.3.3, the
IRS is not bound by its statements
or positions in unofficial pamphlets and publications."
p. 34: "6.
IRS Pamphlets and Booklets.
The IRS is not bound by statements
or positions in its unofficial publications, such as handbooks and
p. 34: "7.
Other Written and Oral Advice. Most taxpayers'
requests for advice from the IRS are made orally.
Unfortunately, the IRS is not bound
by answers or positions stated by its employees orally, whether
in person or by telephone. According to the procedural regulations,
'oral advice is advisory only and the Service is not bound to recognize
it in the examination of the taxpayer's return.' 26 C.F.R. §601.201(k)(2).
In rare cases, however, the IRS has been held to be equitably estopped
to take a position different from that stated orally to, and justifiably
relied on by, the taxpayer. The Omnibus Taxpayer Bill of Rights
Act , enacted as part of the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue
Act of 1988 , gives taxpayers some comfort, however. It amended
section 6404 to require the Service to abate any penalty or addition
to tax that is attributable to advice furnished
in writing by any IRS
agent or employee acting within the scope of his official capacity.
Section 6404 as amended protects the taxpayer only if the following
conditions are satisfied: the written advice from the IRS
was issued in response to a written request from the taxpayer; reliance
on the advice was reasonable; and the error in the advice did not
result from inaccurate or incomplete information having been furnished
by the taxpayer. Thus, it will still be difficult to bind
the IRS even to written statements made by its employees.
As was true before, taxpayers may
be penalized for following oral advice from the IRS."
Procedure and Tax Fraud, Patricia Morgan, 1999, ISBN
0-314-06586-5 , West Group]
make it very difficult to describe yourself as either a “nontaxpayer”
or a person not subject to the Internal Revenue Code on any IRS form.
IRS puts the “exempt” option on their forms, but has no option for “not
subject”. You can be “not subject” and a “nontaxpayer” without
being “exempt” and if you want to properly and lawfully describe yourself
that way, you have to either modify their form or create your own substitute.
You cannot, in fact be an “exempt individual” as defined in 26 U.S.C.
§7701(b)(5) without first being an “individual” and therefore
subject to the I.R.C.. The following entity would be “not subject”
but also not an “exempt individual” or “exempt”, and could include people
as well as property:
TITLE 26 >
Subtitle F >
CHAPTER 79 > § 7701
§ 7701. Definitions
(a) When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly
expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof—
(31) Foreign estate or trust
(A) Foreign estate
The term “foreign estate” means
an estate the income of which, from sources without the United States
which is not effectively
connected with the conduct of a
trade or business within the
United States, is not includible in gross income
under subtitle A.
If you would like to know more about this
4. For the
IRS to be protected by a judicial “protection racket” implemented by
judges who have a conflict of interest as “taxpayers” in violation of
18 U.S.C. §208 , 28 U.S.C. §144 , and 28 U.S.C. §455 . This protection
racket was instituted permanently upon federal judges with the Revenue
Act of 1932 as documented in:
Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245 (1920)
O'Malley v. Woodrough, 307 U.S. 277 (1939)
United States v. Hatter, 121 S.Ct 1782 (2001)
5. To receive what they know in nearly all cases are false information
returns against innocent private parties who are nontaxpayers and to
act as money launderers for all amounts withheld from these innocent
6. To protect the filers of these false reports.
6.1. IRS Forms W-2, 1042-S, 1098, and 1099 do not contain the
individual identity of the person who prepared the form.
6.2. Only IRS Forms 1096 and W-3 contain the identity and statement
under penalty of perjury signed by the
person who filed the false information return.
6.3. If you send a FOIA to the Social Security Administration
asking for the IRS Forms 1096 and W-3 connected to the specific
information returns filed against you, they very conveniently will tell
you that they don’t have the documents, even though they are the ONLY
ones who receive them in the government! They instead tell you
to send a FOIA to the IRS to obtain them. For example, see the
If you want to see the document the above
request responds to, see:
6.4. The IRS
then comes back and says they don’t keep the original Forms 1096 and
W-3 either! Consequently, there is no way to identify the specific
individual who filed the original false reports or to prosecute them
26 U.S.C. §§7206 and
7207 or civilly under
26 U.S.C. §7434 . In that sense, IRS FOIA offices act as “witness
protection programs” for those communist informants for the government
willfully engaged in criminal activity.
Internal Revenue Manual
Returns Transcripts - 1099 Information
information returns are destroyed upon processing. Therefore, original
returns cannot be retrieved. In addition, the IRS may not have record
of all information returns filed by payers. The Information
Returns Master File (IRMF), accessed by CC IRPTR, contains records
of many information returns. The master files are not complete until
October of the year following the issuance of the information document,
and contain the most current year and five (5) previous years. Taxpayers
should be advised to first seek copies of information documents
from the payer. However, upon request, taxpayers or their authorized
designee may receive "information return " information.
Follow guidelines IRM 18.104.22.168 through 22.214.171.124, to ensure
requests are complete and valid.
This information can be requested on TDS.
This information is also available using IRPTR with definer W.
If IRPTR is used without definer W, the following items must
be sanitized before the information is released:
CMIR Form 4790
Form 1099 information is not available through Latham.
7. To deliberately interfere with efforts to correct these false
reports by those who are the wrongful subject of them:
7.1 By penalizing filers of corrected information returns
up to $5,000 for each Form 4852 filed pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §6702.
7.2. By not providing forms to correct the false reports for ALL
THOSE who could be the subject of them. IRS Form 4852, for instance,
says at the top “Attach to Form 1040, 1040A, 1040-EZ, or 1040X
.” There is no equivalent form for use by nonresident aliens
who are victims of false IRS Form W-2 or 1099-R and who
file a 1040NR.
7.3. To refuse to accept W-2C forms filed by those other than
7.4. To refuse to accept custom, substitute, or modified forms
that would correct the original reports.
7.5. To not help those submitting the corrections by saying that
they were not accepted, why they were not accepted, or how to make them
8. To ignore correspondence directed at remedying all the above
abuses and thereby obstruct justice and condone and encourage further
So what we have folks
is a deliberate, systematic plan that:
1. Turns innocent
parties called “nontaxpayers” into guilty parties called “taxpayers”,
which the U.S. Supreme Court said they cannot do.
"In Calder v. Bull, which was here in 1798,
Mr. Justice Chase said,
that there were acts which the Federal and State legislatures could
not do without exceeding their authority, and among them he mentioned
a law which punished a citizen for an innocent act; a law that destroyed
or impaired the lawful private [labor] contracts [and labor compensation,
e.g. earnings from employment through compelled W-4 withholding]
of citizens; a law that made a man judge in his own case; and
a law that took the property
from A [the worker]. and gave it to B [the government or another
citizen, such as through social welfare programs]. 'It is against
all reason and justice,' he added, 'for a people to intrust a legislature
with such powers, and therefore it cannot be presumed that they
have done it. They may command what is right and prohibit what is
wrong; but they cannot change innocence into guilt, or punish innocence
[being a "nontaxpayer"] as a crime [being a "taxpayer"], or violate
the right of an antecedent lawful private [employment] contract
[by compelling W-4 withholding, for instance], or the right of private
property. To maintain that a Federal
or State legislature possesses such powers [of THEFT!] if they had
not been expressly restrained, would, in my opinion, be a political
heresy altogether inadmissible in all free
republican governments.' 3 Dall. 388."
Fund Cases, 99 U.S. 700 (1878)
2. Constitutes a conspiracy to destroy equal protection and equal
treatment that is the foundation of the Constitution, assigning all
sovereignty to the government, and compelling everyone to worship and
serve it without compensation.
3. Constitutes a conspiracy to destroy all Constitutional rights
by compelling Americans through false reports to service the obligations
of an office they cannot lawfully occupy and derive no benefit from:
"It has long been established that a State may not impose
a penalty upon those who exercise a right guaranteed by the Constitution."
Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of California,
271 U.S. 583 . "Constitutional rights would be of little value if
they could be indirectly denied,' Smith v. Allwriqht, 321 U.S. 649,
644 , or manipulated out of existence,' Gomillion v. Lightfoot,
364 U.S. 339, 345."
[Harman v. Forssenius,
380 U.S 528 at 540, 85 S.Ct. 1177, 1185 (1965) ]
4. Constitutes an abuse of tax forms as a federal election device
to unlawfully elect those who aren’t eligible and without their consent
into public office in the government, in criminal violation of
18 U.S.C. §912 .
5. Encourages Americans on a massive scale to file false reports
against their neighbor that compel them into economic servitude and
slavery without compensation:
“You shall not circulate a false report [information return].
Do not put your hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.”
[Exodus, 23:1, Bible, NKJV]
“You shall not
bear false witness [or file a FALSE REPORT or information
return] against your neighbor.”
[Exodus 10:16 , Bible, NKJV]
“A false witness will not go unpunished, And he who speaks
lies shall perish.”
[Prov. 19:9 , Bible, NKJV]
“If a false witness
rises against any man to testify against him of wrongdoing,
then both men in the controversy shall stand before the LORD, before
the priests and the judges who serve in those days. And
the judges shall make careful
inquiry, and indeed, if the witness is a false witness, who has
testified falsely against his brother, then you shall do to
him as he thought to have done to his brother; [enticement
into slavery (pursuant to
42 U.S.C. §1994 )] to the demands of others without compensation]
so you shall put away the evil from among you. And those who
remain shall hear and fear, and hereafter they shall not again commit
such evil among you. Your eye shall not pity: life shall be
for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for
[Deut. 19:16-21, Bible, NKJV]
6. Constitutes a plan to implement communism in America.
The Second Plank of the Communist Manifesto is a heavy, progressive
income tax that punishes the rich and abuses the taxation powers of
the government to redistribute wealth.
7. Constitutes a conspiracy to replace a de jure Constitutional
Republic into nothing but a big for-profit private corporation and business
7.1. Government becomes a virtual or political entity rather than
physical entity tied to a specific territory. All the “States”
after the Civil War rewrote their Constitutions to remove references
to their physical boundaries. Formerly “sovereign” and independent
states have become federal territories and federal corporations by signing
up for federal franchises:
common law, a "corporation" was an "artificial perso[n] endowed
with the legal capacity of perpetual succession" consisting either
of a single individual (termed a "corporation sole") or of a collection
of several individuals (a "corporation aggregate"). 3 H. Stephen,
Commentaries on the Laws of England 166, 168 (1st Am. ed. 1845)
. The sovereign was considered a corporation. See id., at 170; see
also 1 W. Blackstone, Commentaries *467. Under the definitions supplied
by contemporary law dictionaries, Territories would have been classified
as "corporations" (and hence as "persons") at the time that 1983
was enacted and the Dictionary Act recodified. See
W. Anderson, A Dictionary of Law 261
(1893) ("All corporations were originally modeled upon a state or
nation"); 1 J. Bouvier, A Law Dictionary Adapted to the Constitution
and Laws of the United States of America 318-319 (11th ed. 1866)
("In this extensive sense the United
States may be termed a corporation"); Van Brocklin v. Tennessee,
117 U.S. 151, 154 (1886)
("`The United States is a . . .
great corporation . . . ordained and established by the American
people'") (quoting United [495
U.S. 182, 202] States v. Maurice,
26 F. Cas. 1211, 1216 (No. 15,747) (CC Va. 1823)
(Marshall, C. J.));
v. United States, 11 How. 229, 231 (1851) (United States is "a corporation").
See generally Trustees of
Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518, 561-562 (1819) (explaining
history of term "corporation").
v. Sanchez, 495 U.S. 182 (1990)]
7.2. All rights
have been replaced with legislatively created corporate “privileges”
and franchises. See:
and “residents” are little more than “employees” and officers of the
corporation described in
26 U.S.C. §6671(b),
26 U.S.C. §7343, and
5 U.S.C. §2105. See:
7.4. You join
the club and become an officer and employee of the corporation by declaring
yourself to be a statutory but not constitutional “U.S.
citizen” on a government form. See:
Security Numbers and Taxpayer Identification Numbers serve as de facto
license numbers authorizing those who use them to act in the capacity
of a public officer, trustee, and franchisee within the government.
Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) serve as a substitute for lawful
money and are really nothing but private scrip for internal use by officers
of the government. They are not lawful money because they are
not redeemable in gold or silver as required by the Constitution.
"Income Taxes” are nothing but insurance premiums to pay for “social
insurance benefits”. They are also used to regulate the supply
of fiat currency. See:
7.8. The so-called
“law book”, the Internal Revenue Code, is the private law franchise
agreement which regulates compensation to and “kickbacks” from the officers
of the corporation, which includes you. See:
courts are really just private binding corporate arbitration for disputes
between fellow officers of the corporation. See:
Terms in the Constitution have been redefined to limit themselves to
federal territory not protected by the original de jure constitution
through judicial and prosecutorial word-smithing.
“When words lose their meaning, people will lose their liberty
[Confucius, 500 B.C. ]
“Judicial verbicide is calculated to convert the Constitution
into a worthless scrap of paper and to replace our government of
laws with a judicial oligarchy.”
[Senator Sam Ervin, during Watergate hearing]
Legal Deception, Propaganda, and Fraud, Form #05.014
Rules of Presumption and Statutory
Interpretation, Litigation Tool #01.006
a plan to unwittingly recruit the average American into servitude of
this communist/socialist effort.
TITLE 50 >
CHAPTER 23 >
SUBCHAPTER IV > Sec. 841.
Sec. 841. - Findings and declarations of fact
finds and declares that the Communist Party of the United States
[consisting of the IRS, DOJ, and a corrupted federal judiciary],
although purportedly a political party, is in fact an instrumentality
of a conspiracy to overthrow the [de jure] Government of the United
States [and replace it with a de facto government ruled by the judiciary].
It constitutes an authoritarian
dictatorship [IRS, DOJ, and corrupted federal judiciary in collusion]
within a [constitutional]
for itself the rights and
immunity from prosecution for their wrongdoing in violation of
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8
of the Constitution] accorded to political parties,
but denying to all others
the liberties [Bill of Rights] guaranteed by the Constitution.
Unlike political parties, which evolve their policies and programs
through public means, by the reconciliation of a wide variety of
individual views, and submit those policies and programs to the
electorate at large for approval or disapproval, the policies and
programs of the Communist Party are secretly [by
corrupt judges and the IRS in complete disregard of the tax laws]
prescribed for it by the foreign leaders of the world Communist
movement [the IRS and Federal
Its members [the Congress,
which was terrorized to do IRS bidding recently by the framing of
have no part in determining its goals, and are not permitted to
voice dissent to party objectives. Unlike members of political parties,
members of the Communist Party are recruited for indoctrination
[in the public schools by homosexuals, liberals, and socialists]
with respect to its objectives and methods, and are organized, instructed,
and disciplined [by the IRS and a corrupted judiciary] to carry
into action slavishly the assignments given them by their hierarchical
Unlike political parties,
the Communist Party [thanks to a
corrupted federal judiciary]
acknowledges no constitutional or statutory limitations upon its
conduct or upon that of its members.
The Communist Party is relatively small numerically, and
gives scant indication of capacity ever to attain its ends by lawful
The peril inherent in its operation arises not from its numbers,
but from its failure to acknowledge any limitation as to the nature
of its activities, and its dedication to the proposition that the
present constitutional Government of the United States ultimately
must be brought to ruin by any available means, including resort
violence [or using
Holding that doctrine,
its role as the agency of a hostile
foreign power [the
Federal Reserve and the American Bar Association (ABA)] renders
its existence a clear present and continuing danger to the security
of the United States. It is the means whereby individuals
are seduced into the service of the world Communist movement, trained
to do its bidding, and directed and controlled in the conspiratorial
performance of their revolutionary services. Therefore, the Communist
Party should be outlawed
an effort to create and perpetuate a state-sponsored religion and to
compel “tithes” called income tax to the state-sponsored church, which
is the government:
To close this section,
we highly recommend the following FOIA you can send to the IRS and the
Social Security Administration that is useful as a reliance defense
to expose the FRAUD described in this section upon the American people: