MARK OF THE BEAST -- 42 USC Sec. 666


......and the name of the Beast is 666. For those of you who said 30-40 years ago that the Social Security Number would be the Mark of the Beast, I have some good news and some bad news. The good news is that you can say you were right. The bad news is that almost everyone in this Nation founded on Christian principles has the Mark. Americans can not get a job, get a drivers license, have a bank account, get a loan, vote, or even file a tax return with out the Mark of the Beast. Big Brother (The Devil?) knows what you make, what you have, and where to find you. Next will come fingerprinting and electronic banking. You will not even be able to purchase food or medicine for yourself or your family without the Mark of the Beast. Your children will be (most are now) raised and schooled by the Beast. Now, with "hate crimes", "thought police", and federal monitors in the schools to report little "children who pray" to the federal court, I challenge you to name a single area of your physical life not controlled by the government. The technology exists to put your "life information" on a chip (similar to the magnetic strip on a credit card) and to implant the chip under the skin. There is already talk in Washington of using implants in the U.S. military for "identification purposes". Will the rest of America be next?

Don't believe it? The above are just a few areas where The Mark of the Beast already controls your life. The Constitution of America no longer exists, federal courts operate under international law ( not Constitutional law), the bill of rights are gone, the states have no rights, YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS! "Freedom" web sites such as this one are now labeled "hate talk" and may not exist much longer. Since we hate tyranny, we are considered dangerous by the government. Also, through Non Government Organizations (NGO's) and environmentalist groups supported by The Beast, the lifestyle of your family will forever change.

Thanks to Scott McDonald, current and proposed laws have been researched, and the extent of control will amaze you. For much more information on Section 666, visit or visit Scott's site at . Following are some of Scott's thoughts and research results.

The devil's in the details. And you'll need to pay close attention to recognize the deception hiding in the details of the recently enacted "Balanced Budget Act of 1997," (H.R.2015).

As you must already know, back in 1996 Congress enacted the "Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996" - Public Law 104-193, which established the largest, most intrusive locating and tracking database system ever imagined by mankind.

Under the pretext of cracking down on ''deadbeat dads'' a national system was implemented which will allow State and Federal agencies to "locate" absent parents anywhere across the country to extract unpaid child support payments. A parent who falls behind on payments will have their real property encumbered, bank accounts seized, wages garnished, tax refunds intercepted, and all occupational and business licenses either suspended or withheld.

P.L. 104-193 also provided that in order for the States to continue to receive "Child Support Program" and "Aid to Families With Dependent Children" federal funding the States must collect data on all productive members of society so that the information can be fed into a data collection system. The information will then be used to identify and locate the personal possessions and assets of any targeted delinquent parent.

Sec. 317, of the Act amended Title 42 U.S.C. 666(a)(13) to require that, as a condition to receiving federal funds States must "establish procedures requiring that the social security number of any applicant for a professional license, commercial driver's license, recreational license, occupational license, or marriage license be recorded on the application"

Here's where you must pay special attention to the details. Notice that it does not say "driver's license". Notice that the second type of license for which the States must obtain a SSN is a "commercial driver's license". It just so happens that there is a 170 million license difference between these two classes of licensed drivers!

Back in 1996 when H.R.3734 was being debated it was much easier to overcome any opposition to the SSN requirement with it applying to only to the 10 million or so "commercial" drivers in the country. There's simply fewer numbers of negatively affected subjects out there to raise objections when the legislation only imposes upon a relatively small segment of the population as this bill first did.

However, just one year after the SSN requirements were implemented, Congress DELETED the word "COMMERCIAL" from this section of the Act, thereby changing the scope of the SSN requirement so as to now apply to ALL 180 MILLION LICENSED DRIVERS. By deleting that one word: "commercial" the "Balanced Budget Act of 1997" served to expand the scope of Title 42 U.S.C. 666(a)(13) from what was a relatively small group of about 10 million commercial driver's to now include all of the nearly 180 million non-commercial licensed drivers in the U.S.

DO NOT THINK that the people responsible for drafting this legislation just "forgot" to include the additional 170 million drivers on the first go-around.... not on your life. They intended to enact the softly worded version first. Then, they simply waited a year and surreptitiously modified the wording to consummate their dirty deed. It was intended all along.

But wait, there's more... Followers of this subject may remember that P.L. 104-193 provided that the States could optionally choose to use a number other than a social security number. Title 42 U.S.C. Sec 666(a)(13) previously stated that, for the purposes of administering the licensing requirements of that section -- "if a State allows the use of a number other than the social security number, the State shall so advise any applicants."

Clearly, the States were given an option to use another number other than a social security number and still be in compliance with the Act's funding requirements. However, H.R.2015 has now amended Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 666(a)(13) by adding just twenty-one new words that completely change the meaning of that section of law. The wording of Section 666(a)(13) now prohibits the States from using any number other than a social security number if they want to continue to receive the funding!

The law now reads: "if a State allows the use of a number other than the social security number to be used on the face of the document while the social security >number is kept on file at the agency,< the State shall so advise any applicants."

So now the States may use another number only "on the face of the license" but must obtain the 180 million SSNs from all licensed driver's and feed them into Big Brother's nationally accessible locating and tracking database for future use.

You may be wondering what they need all those SSNs for anyway. The SSN is the universal identification number with which the Child Support Enforcement Agency will locate the dead-beat dads. To this end title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 666(a)(12) was amended to require that each participant State must implement procedures to "ensure that all Federal and State agencies conducting activities under [the child support enforcement laws] have access to any system used by the State to locate an individual for purposes relating to motor vehicles or law enforcement." And, Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 666(a)(16) requires that the States must implement procedures under which "the State has (and uses in appropriate cases) authority to withhold or suspend, or to restrict the use of driver's licenses, professional and occupational licenses, and recreational and sporting licenses of individuals owing overdue support..." [parenthetical statement in original]

This way, their licenses can be easily located and seized should they ever need to be for any reason - oh, I mean should the person ever fail to pay child support. We must all be willing to relinquish just a little tiny bit of our freedoms to get at those dead-beats you know. You'll hardly even notice -- if it is done a little at a time.

And I almost forgot to mention, "sporting" licenses were also added by H.R.2015 to the list of revocable licenses. I guess we'll have to wait and see if this provision will ever be used as authority to seize someone's "pistol permit" license???

Once all the bugs are worked out this huge data collection system will surely and inevitably be expanded to include additional classes of social misfits.

After all, the only thing standing in the way of that now is just a few... little... words......


This is just a sample of what you will find at Scott's site. Please visit at: