Cause No(s). _____________________________

The State of Texas			§           IN THE _________________________ COURT 
					§	   
VS.           		                      	§	 ________________________________________						§	 	
____________________________   	§ 	 __________________ COUNTY, TEXAS

Judicial Notice
Pursuant under 201(d) of the Texas and Federal Rules of Evidence
MANDATORY
Public Law 93-595: A Court shall take Judicial Notice if requested by a party and supplied with the necessary information.

Pursuant to; RULE 169 TEXAS RULES OF COURT
1.	Request for admission. At any time after commencement of the action, a party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of Rule l66b, set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request.

REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS

The Aggrieved Party hereby serves this request to the alleged plaintiff pursuant to RULE 169.

1. 	The alleged charges, in this case, are found in the TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CODE. 
2.		The TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CODE applies to “persons” engaged in “Transportation”.
3.	Black’s Law 6th edition defines Transportation as; “The movement of goods or persons from one place to another, by carrier. ( Interstate Commerce Com’n v. Brimson, 154 U.S. 447, 14 S. Ct. 1125, 38 L. Ec. 1047.)
4.	The Aggrieved Party, in this case, is not alleged, by the plaintiff, to have been engaged in “The movement of goods or persons” on the date of the alleged offense.
5. 	The Aggrieved Party, in this alleged case, is not alleged, by the plaintiff, to be a “Carrier”
6.	“The Right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways ... either by carriage or automobile is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a  common law Right which he has under the Right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” (Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579 )
7.	“The Right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without Due Process of Law.” (Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125.)
8.	The Aggrieved Party, in this alleged case, has never been deprived of his Right to travel by “Due Process of Law.”
9.	“The State cannot diminish the Rights of the people.” (Hertado v. California, 110 US 516)
10.	“Where Rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” (Miranda v. Arizona, 324 US 436, 491.)
11.	‘The Aggrieved Party in this alleged case has claimed his Constitutionally secured Right to travel. (see filed Affidavit For The Right To Travel)
12.	“The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime.” (Miller v. US, 230 F 486 at 489)
13.	“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed on one because of the exercise of a constitutional right.” ( Sherer v. Cullen, 481 F. 946)
14.	“The assertion of federal rights, when plainly made, is not to be defeated in the name of local practice.” (Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, at 24)
15.	The alleged plaintiff in this alleged case has no evidence showing, that the Aggrieved Party has ever knowingly, willingly, and intentionally with full disclosure, waived his Constitutionally secured Right to travel.
16.	The Aggrieved Party, in this alleged case, is not a 14th  amendment “Person”.

17.	The alleged plaintiff in this case has no authority to regulate the Aggrieved Party’s Right to travel.
18. The alleged charges, in this alleged case, are an attempt, by the alleged plaintiff, to regulate this Aggrieved Party’s Right to travel.
19.	The Aggrieved Party is not under the regulatory authority of the TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CODE.
20.	The alleged plaintiff, in this case, has no standing (nexus) in this court.
21.	The Texas Constitution states at Article III, section 29, “The enacting clause of all laws shall be: "Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Texas."”
22.	The Texas Constitution states at Article III, section 30, “No law shall be passed, except by bill, and no bill shall be so amended in its passage through either House, as to change its original purpose.”
23.	The Texas Constitution states at Article III, section 32, “No bill shall have the force of a law, until it has been read on three several days in each House, and free discussion allowed thereon; but four-fifths of the House, in which the bill may be pending, may suspend this rule, the yeas and nays being taken on the question of suspension, and entered upon the journals.”
24.	The Texas Constitution states at Article III, section 36, “No law shall be revived or amended by reference to its title; but in such case the act revived, or the section or sections amended, shall be re-enacted and published at length.”
25. The TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CODE is not law as it does not conform to the requirements set forth for laws in the Texas Constitution at Article III, sections 29, 30, 32, and 36.
26.	The Constitution for the United States of America states; “This Constitution and laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof… shall be the supreme law of the land and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary not one word withstanding… all executive and judicial officers,  both of the United States, and of the several States, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution”.
27.	There is no Damaged Party in this alleged case.
28.	A class ‘C’ Misdemeanor is not a jailable offense.
29.	All of the Aggrieved Party charges are of a class ‘C’ Misdemeanor.
30.	The Aggrieved Party, in this alleged case, is not alleged, by the plaintiff, to have been in commercial activity at the time of arrest.

Respectfully,
_________________________________

Send responses to above location

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the forgoing has been delivered to the following party or counsel of record via certified mail, return receipt requested, hand delivery or fax on this ______  day of ________________________, 200__.
______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________

_________________________________

INSTRUCTIONS

This document can be served on the prosecutor, right after arraignment or at least 10 before the pretrial. This document is for the prosecutor to admit that the Transportation Code does not apply to you when you are not in commerce.

Line 1: Where you put the cause numbers of the case.
Line 2: Put either ‘Municipal’, ‘Justice of the Peace’ or County.
Line 3: Put  either ‘In the City of (whatever City)”, “Precinct (whatever number)” or “(whatever county Court it is – like – At Law #11)
Line 4: Put your name in Upper and Lower Caps.
Line 5: Put whatever county the court is in – like – “Galveston”.
Line 6: Sign your name, below the line, print your name in Upper and Lower Caps then below that print your address.
Line 7: Put the numbered day of the Month that you serve a copy of this document to the prosecutor.
Line 8: Put the name of the Month that you serve a copy of this document to the prosecutor.
Line 9: Put the last number of the year that you serve a copy of this document to the prosecutor. – like - 2001 .
Line 10: Put “ Prosecutor for (Whatever Court)
Line 11: Put the street address where the prosecutor will be served.
Line 12: Put the City, State and Zipcode where the Prosecutor will be served.
Line 13: Sign your name, print your name in Upper and Lower Caps then below that print your address.

Original goes to the clerk of the court, one copy to the Prosecutor and one copy for you to keep and have stamped by the clerk. Be sure and NOT include the instruction sheets.