Is the United States Government Guilty of Genocide?
Volume 1, No. 5
by
Richard McDonald
When this Nation was founded, each of the individual States
of this union had their own Citizens (Capital "C") as defined in
the Constitution, but, then came the so-called 14th Amendment.
For clarification purposes, the term "Citizen" when used in
the constitutional sense with a capital "C" shall designate a
State Citizen as per the intent of the Founding Fathers of this
Nation, when used with a small "c" as it is used in the so-called
14th Amendment shall designate the federal citizen which is a
different class of citizen. In law, every letter in a word is
important, the capitalization of a specific word means a specific
thing, the use of the same word, without the capitalization may
mean something else, in this case it does; the "Citizen" does
not include the "citizen", the word "Resident" does not include
the "resident."
I
There is a clear distinction between national and State
citizenship. U.S. citizenship does not entitle citizen of the
privileges and immunities of the Citizen of the State. K.
Tashiro v. Jordan, 256 P. 545, 201 Cal. 239, 53 A.L.R. 1279,
affirmed 49 S.Ct. 47, 278 U.S. 123, 73 L.Ed. 214, 14 C.J.S. Sec
?2, p. 1131, n. 75. In fact Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Edition,
agrees with the distinction between different classes of
citizenship:
"privileges and immunities clause. There are two Privileges
and Immunities Clauses in the federal Constitution and
Amendments, the first being found in Art. IV, and the second
in the 14th Amendment, Sec. 1, second sentence, clause 1.
The provision in Art. IV states that "The Citizens of each
State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of
Citizens in the several States," while the 14th Amendment
provides that "No State shall make or enforce any law which
shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of
the United States."
[pages 1078-1079.]
Note the lack of capitalization in the wording used in the 14th
Amendment, this specifically means that the words "citizens,
privileges, immunities" are not the same as in Article IV.
The State of California was admitted to the Union of the
united States in 1849 by an Act for Admission of California into
the Union, Vol. 9, Statutes at Large page 452, and was admitted
into the Union on an equal footing with the original States in
all respects whatsoever.
The State of California was required to have its own
Citizens, who were first, State Citizens, then as a consequence
of State Citizenship were American Citizens, known as Citizens of
the United States, (Capital "C") there were no specific class as
this, but for travelling and protection by the United States
government while out of the country, they were generally called
Citizens of the United States. (capital "C")
The Constitution for the United States of America (1787)
used the term "Citizen of the United States" in Article I,
Section 2, (capital "C"), and numerous other sections each time
with capitalization, this referred to the Sovereign Political
Body of State Citizens, this Citizen is entitled to all the
Privileges and Immunities of the Citizens of the several States
under Article IV.
Congress utilized the same term "citizen of the United
States" qualifying it with a small "c" to distinguish the
"federal citizen" in the so-called 14th Amendment. These
"citizens" have only statutory rights granted by Congress.
Thus, Congress and most of the Judiciary have acknowledged
that an amendatory act cannot alter the original intent of the
Constitution. Therefore Congress did not alter the meaning of
the term "Citizen of the United States" (Capital "C"), it still
remains the same, a Citizen of a State.
In the past, the Judiciary, without the distinction being
properly brought forth have made rulings based upon the federal
"citizens" who are resident in a State, not State Citizens
domiciled within their own State.
The statement by Chief Justice Taney in Dred Scott v.
Sanford, 19 How. 393, 422, in defining the term "persons" the
Judge stated "... persons who are not recognized as Citizens."
See also American and Ocean Ins. Co. v. Canter, 1 Pet. 511, which
also distinguishes "persons" and "Citizens." These were the
persons that were the object of the 14th Amendment, to give to
this class of native born "persons" who were "resident" in the
union of the United States citizenship, and authority to place
other than the white race within the special category of "citizen
of the United States."
To overcome the statement in Dred Scott, supra, that only
white people were Citizens, and all other persons were only
"residents" without citizenship of the States, Congress then
passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 14 STAT. 27.
The Act of Congress called the Civil Rights Act, 14 U.S.
Stats. at Large, p. 27, which was the forerunner of the 14th
Amendment, amply shows the intent of Congress:
"all persons born in the United States and not subject to
any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby
declared to be citizens of the United States, and such
citizens of every race and color * * * shall have the same
right in every state and territory of the United States * *
* to full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for
the security of person and property as is enjoyed by white
citizens."
[again, note the lack of capitalization]
This was the intent of Congress, not to infringe upon the
Constitution or the status of the de jure Citizens of the several
States. The term "persons" did not include the white de jure
State Citizens. It was never the intent of the 14th Amendment to
subvert the States' authority or that of the Constitution as it
relates to the status of the de jure State Citizens. People v.
Washington, 36 C. 658, 661 (1869) overruled on other grounds;
French v. Barber, 181 U.S. 324; MacKenzie v. Hare, 60 L. Ed.
297.
The so-called 14th Amendment uses language very similar to
the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and Harlan J., in a dissenting
opinion quoted from the veto message of President Johnson his
interpretation of its meaning: It "comprehends the Chinese of
the Pacific States, Indians subject to taxation, the people
called Gypsies, as well as the entire race designated as blacks,
persons of color, negroes, mulattoes and persons of African
blood. Every individual of those races born in the United States
is made a citizen thereof." Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94, 114, 5
S.Ct. 41, 28 L.Ed. 643; see also In re Gee Hop, 71 Fed. 274 .
It was the intent of the so-called amendment, that the de
jure Citizens in the several States were not included in the
terminology, as they were by birthright Citizens as defined in
the Preamble, and could receive nothing from this so-called
amendment. "No white person born within the limits of the United
States and subject to their jurisdiction ... owes his status of
Citizenship to the recent amendments to the Federal Constitution"
Van Valkenburg v. Brown, 43 Cal. Sup Ct. 43.
In 1913, came the Federal Reserve Act (our downfall), then
in 1924, Cook v. Tait, which stated that "citizens of the United
States wherever they are resident" are subject to the income tax
which is based upon citizenship of the United States, now the
government, could not tax only the citizens of the United States
under the so-called 14th Amendment, and not tax the white State
Citizens, if they did that there would have been a revolution
here in America, so the Federal Reserve Banks deliberately caused
the crash of 1929 (Congressional Record), and made all the people
who had saved for their old age lose their money that they were
saving, then the government, in 1935 instituted "Social
Security", and this was controlled and handled by each State on
a state level, so the States could handle their own Citizens and
"residents" under the so-called 14th Amendment. Then in 1939 the
U.S. government repealed the Social Security Act (a little known
fact), and reenacted it into the 1939 Income Tax Code, with a new
intent and meaning classifying everyone who has a SSN a
"taxpayer" and a federal citizen of the United States under the
so-called 14th Amendment.
Now the U.S. Government knowing this, under prompting of the
Federal Reserve, stated that the people of America were saving
too much money, and therefore should pay an excise tax. This was
the Victory Tax to help out World War II, but in one year the
government made so much money on this tax, they decided to repeal
the two-year limitation on this Victory tax, and telling no one,
they made it a permanent tax on the citizens of the United States
who have SSN.
In addition there are two naturalization clauses in the U.S.
Constitution, (1) Under Article I, Section 8, where only white
immigrants are to be naturalized as State Citizens by each
separate State, and (2) Under the so-called 14th Amendment for
all others, to be naturalized as a federal citizen (small "c").
The United States Government is naturalizing everyone under the
so-called 14th Amendment as a federal citizen. WHY?
So what happened to the Sovereign, Political and Cultural
class of white State Citizens who are not subjects of Congress?
Have they all been eliminated and reclassified as citizens of the
United States under the so-called 14th Amendment?
II
Webster's Third International Dictionary, page 947:
GENOCIDE 1. The use of deliberate systematic measures (as
killing, bodily or mental injury, unlivable conditions)
calculated to bring about the extermination of a racial,
political or cultural group, (2) or destroy the language,
religion or culture of a group.
The writer believes that the United States Government is
guilty of using the so-called 14th Amendment and Social Security
to force unlivable conditions (you cannot work if you don't have
a social security number) to accomplish genocide as it is
described above to enlarge and maintain a revenue base for the
profit of the Federal Reserve. Forced integration is destroying
the White Political Cultural group known as State Citizens in all
the States.
Now anyone can do their own research and arrive at the same
legally correct determination that I have. I did not cite all
the Congressional Records (CR) but, you could look them up if you
were so inclined. The proof is there, so what are you going to
do about it?
Continue to be a victim of genocide!!!
# # #
Return to Table of Contents